Who can do well in math? How you answer that question may depend on where you live. Whereas people in East Asian countries tend to believe that hard work can lead anyone to succeed at math, people in the United States are more likely to believe that people need natural talent in the subject to succeed. This perception means that students in the U.S. may be particularly susceptible to racial and gender stereotypes about who is and is not “good at math.”
“Americans don't realize what strange stereotypes we have about math,” says Shifrer. “It really sets kids up for failure here." The fact that some high school students are more likely to give up on math than others has important implications for their individual futures and for the lack of diversity in STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) careers.
“U.S. STEM spaces are not a meritocracy,” says Shifrer. “The cultural biases that we have around people's identities, status characteristics like race and gender, and our cultural stereotypes about math and science and who belongs there play a key role in who enters these fields and does well in them. The more that educators and students are aware of that and take action to counteract it, the more it could really shift access and representation.”
In the study, Shifrer and colleagues sought to determine if teachers could counteract cultural biases and help students develop a positive “math identity”—the sense of seeing themselves as ‘a math person’ or as a person who can succeed in math. In particular, they hypothesized that ninth graders who perceived their math teacher as being more equitable—treating everyone in the class fairly and providing clear resources for success—would have stronger math identities.
In their analysis, the researchers grouped students by their race and gender and by the racial composition of their school’s student body—that is, whether they attended a racially diverse school, a school where they were racially distinct or a school where most of their peers shared their race. They also controlled for factors that might be alternate explanations for a seeming relationship between perceived teacher equity and math identity, such as prior achievement in math, type of school, social advantages and teacher’s preparation to teach math.
The results showed that students who perceived their math teachers as being more equitable had stronger math identities than those who saw their math teachers as less equitable. “If teachers are teaching in a way that the kids perceive as equitable and efficacious, then it really makes a big difference in how the students feel about math,” says Shifrer.
The researchers also found that this positive effect of equitable teaching on students’ attitudes toward math was strongest in racially diverse schools. “It seemed like teachers mattered more in those schools maybe because race is more evident in those schools,” says Shifrer. “Kids are looking around and noticing that there are differences in students’ race and maybe they're thinking more about whether they’re the kind of student that’s good at math. The teachers really had a space to make a difference in schools like that.”
The Role of Resiliency
While the relationship between teacher equity and math identity was evident across races, there was an interesting exception. Black students, in general, had strong math identities, regardless of their teacher’s actions. “There's some kind of resiliency where these students persist and strive against racist stereotypes,” says Shifrer. “They discount these dominant narratives and think, ‘I belong here; I'm good at this.’”
Learning about the factors that affect student math identity is important because a student’s attitude towards the subject influences the courses that they take as well as their future career selections. This study suggests that teachers may have a larger role to play in helping students develop a positive math identity than previously recognized.
The study by researchers at Portland State University, Loyola University Chicago and the University of North Texas was published in the journal Sociology of Education. Dara Shifter, associate professor of sociology at Portland State and former middle school math teacher, led the study.
This study reminds us of the important role that a teacher can play in the life of a child, and how that teacher’s influence can affect the child’s future in so many ways. Math is an important life skill as well as a work-and-career skill. The “can-do” attitude that we see here in math is the same “can-do” attitude that we expect to see as children master the increasingly difficult exercises of the Step Up software programs. This research reminds us not only of the importance of math, but also of the “I can do this” attitude that comes from experiencing success.
Reposted from Portland State University
Note by Nancy W Rowe, M.S., CCC/A